Science Fiction Perspectives

sci-fi-picPhoto Credit: Artwork for DVD Open Movie workshop “Blend&Paint”, 2011, by David Revoy, published by the Blender Foundation, created by Blender and painted over with Gimp painter and MyPaint: Deevad/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY 3.0

“Technology and literature are both expressions of the human heart and mind.” (Toutonghi, par. 7)

I think I need a disclaimer for this post. I don’t write science fiction (or its sister genre, fantasy) and I don’t read it either. I do sometimes see classic films that fall into this genre and enjoy most of them. But the idea of science fiction and fantasy as the area where, in our modern world, crazy diversions into the imagination seems to be the most accepted intrigues me and when I read Steve Toutonghi’s “How Science Fiction Redefines Who We Are and What We’re Becoming, I couldn’t help but think about the dominance of this genre in American literature, film, and television in the last fifty or so years.

Science fiction, of course, deals with technologies which exist but have gone awry or do not yet exist. In that sense, it reimagines the present and imagines the future. Of course, there is much more to science fiction than this, which science fiction authors and creators know better than I. But, as Toutonghi points out, “[a]s we attempt to shape a new understanding of our selves, fiction—with its dexterous intermingling of words and dreams—is a natural place to turn for new perspectives.” (par. 21). In other words, science fiction is a genre that invents the impossible or brings the impossible into an all-too-real future. In an earlier blog post about the imagination, I wrote about how science fiction films from the 1970’s such as Soylent Green and The China Syndrome eerily predicted the breaking down of our environment for the future.

This is both science fiction’s strength and, in some ways, its drawback. In her book on writing, The Novel of the Future, Nin repeatedly points out that, in the past, the most imaginative works were in the science fiction genre: “We [treat] all lyrical flights as disorders rather than flights of imagination. Imagination is permitted only science and in science fiction.” (Nin, Chap. 1, location 355; emphasis added). This might be overstating it a bit, but consider Nin’s context. She wrote most of her lyrical prose and fiction of psychological reality during the 1930’s and 1940’s when the Hemingwayesque way of writing (philosophical but clean, ungarnished prose) was in vogue. In the post-war era, the focus was outward, on building a stronger and richer world after the ravages of war. Given this context, “lyrical flights” and “flights of imagination” would be put in a specific category for people to enjoy but not really accepted in others.

But as Nin points out, the ability to imagine beyond reality shouldn’t be regulated to a specific genre. Science fiction and fantasy focuses the imagination mainly on the exterior and shows people act and react to that imaginative environment. The kind of fiction I write, psychological fiction, focuses on the interior, that is, characters’ lives and emotions, and shows how they deal with it, their environment folding into that. As Nin writes:

“Good science fiction shows you the world of tomorrow based on scientific probabilities. Good exploratory writing shows you the man of tomorrow, the man you might be, based on psychological probabilities.” (Chap 7, location 3067; emphasis added)

The two aren’t mutually exclusive, only differently focused.

Nin wrote her book in the late 1960’s, a time when an entire generation was beginning to open up their minds to new things and she predicted “a greater liberation of the imagination (which had taken refuge in science fiction, having nowhere else to go).” (Chap. 8, location 3496). I think as far as literature is concerned, in some ways this has been true. Writers and readers are much more accepting of imaginative elements (both exterior and interior) in other genres besides science fiction and fantasy. One such genre is magic realism. However, it’s interesting to note that when I put this as one of the categories for my latest book, Gnarled Bones and Other Stories on Amazon, the subgenre appears firmly under the larger category of science fiction and fantasy. Magical realism is actually where reality meets fantasy, where fantastic elements mingle with real life and are accepted as givens rather than out-of-the-ordinary occurrences. I expected magic realism to be under the fiction or even literary category but it wasn’t. I think this is a great example of our ambivalence towards mingling “flights of imagination” in the context of reality rather than separating them into neat little categories.

Works Cited

Nin, Anais. The Novel of the Future. Sky Blue Press. The Anais Nin Trust, 2014 (original publication date 1968). Kindle digital file.

Toutonghi, Steve. “How Science Fiction Redefines Who We Are, And What We’re Becoming.” Literary Hub. Grove Atlantic and Electric Literature, 2015. 18 April 2016. Web. 25 January 2017.

 

 

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Science Fiction Perspectives

  1. I do write science fiction and fantasy (as well as more realistic fiction). The best part is how, when people (readers and writers) think they are only playing, they often get to the deepest heart of what matters most. @mirymom1 from
    Balancing Act

    Like

    1. Thanks for your comment, Mirymom. I do agree with that. It seems like a lot of science fiction and fantasy today isn’t about escapism but about exploring deeper issues and possible future issues in a different context. I have a lot of respect for these genres even though I don’t write in them.

      Tam

      Like

  2. Sci-fi as a genre is so good at bringing current events yo light without it being seen as a lecture or “preachy”. The new Battlestar Galactica was a prime example of this, coming out when it did right after 9/11. It addressed some serious issues including terrorism and the aftermath of an attack, racism, fear-mongering, etc. All disguised as weekly entertainment for those who watched it.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s